That all depends on what your present video card is and what your old video card is. Most newer cards have DVI out and it's hard to imagine why you would have taken out a card with DVI and replaced it with one that doesn't have it. DVI does make a huge difference in clarity and color quality, but if your VGA card is better (faster/ more able to use for games etc.) then stick with the VGA or maybe invest in a new card.
Thanks B for getting back. That was a bit of important Info I left out!! the current card without DVI is a ATI Radion 9200 128 mb. The old card with the DVI connector is a Nvidia Geforce3 TI 200 64mb. I guess I thought the Radeon was a better card. I went from 64mb up to 128mb and it was pretty inexpensive. DUH. I guess I understand why now.
i asked exactly the same question before purchasing my 19 inch 193FP. receiving 3 answers that the difference in view between digital and analog is almost imperceptible i purchased 193fp rather than 1905FP, The analog view between 193fp and 1905fp is the same. they are obviously the same monitor. i have never seen a digital view, but the analog view on these monitors is very nice. feb, kcmo
Its just another process where noise or interference can get in, you need to remember ur going from digital to analog and back to dig with reg. DVI is all digital so less noise and a bit faster in my opion.colors do look a tad better too. Its all about get the most out of the monitor.Like using reg gas in a corvett.
Thanks all for your imput. I have the 2005FPW hooked up digitally and it is great. The only issue for me is the size of everything. Really small at that resolution. At my age, seeing clearly is a wonderful thing. I will have to definitely upgrade the graphics at somepoint but for now everything is good. Thanks again
DVI is entirely superior to an analog solution. If you have a digital video card and a fixed pixel digital flat panel, you should reap the benefits by using a "straight-through" digital connnection.
Using analog will degrade the signal in a number of ways.
1) Analog signals are a lossy system. Some of the signal is lost through the cable itself. Digital does not have that problem.
2) Since your video card and your flat panel are digital devices, in order for them to work in analog, the video signal must be converted from digital -> analog -> and then back to digital.
The reason why flat panel manufacturers are configuring them to support both is so they don't alienate users looking to upgrade their monitor. In the past, the majority of desktops computers were sold with budget video cards that only output analog (to hook up to CRT monitors). Now, due to DVI becoming more mainstream, that is all changing.
However, there is still an issue with laptops. The vast majority of laptops only output analog to a secondary (external) device. Only the most high performance laptops have DVI output (i.e. DELL Inspiron XPS Gen 2)-- I'm sure that will eventually change as well.
B-
10 Posts
0
April 1st, 2005 04:00
Message Edited by B- on 04-01-2005 01:14 PM
Sarob76
5 Posts
0
April 1st, 2005 08:00
Thanks B for getting back. That was a bit of important Info I left out!! the current card without DVI is a ATI Radion 9200 128 mb. The old card with the DVI connector is a Nvidia Geforce3 TI 200 64mb. I guess I thought the Radeon was a better card. I went from 64mb up to 128mb and it was pretty inexpensive. DUH. I guess I understand why now.
Thanks again
fb0252
1 Rookie
•
108 Posts
0
April 1st, 2005 18:00
steve_89
552 Posts
0
April 3rd, 2005 04:00
Sarob76
5 Posts
0
April 3rd, 2005 11:00
ChandlerL
44 Posts
0
April 18th, 2005 19:00