No, you don't need to have any folders designated as shared folders on the remote PC in order for it to communicate with the printer. Since the host PC is running XP, have you checked to make sure that the XP firewall is disabled. The XP firewall will not block sharing of the Shared Documents folder, but it will block access to any other folder and will block access to the printer.
Here's what I've done. On the host PC there are two listings under Network Connections. One is the Local Area Network (Intel (R) Pro/100 VE Network Connection), which I assume is the ethernet card in the computer. This has the Internet Connection Firewall disabled. The other is the broadband modem that is connected to the router. Here the ICF is enabled. I tried turning off ICF for the modem as well, but still no luck.
I don't understand why you have two network connections. Do you have two ethernet cards in the computer? Normally with a router, there should only be one connection. How is this all connected together? The router should be connected to the broadband modem through its WAN or Internet port. The computers should be connected either to one of the LAN ports on the router or through the wireless adapter, yet you say one of the computer is connected to the Dimension through the USB adapter. Are you running Internet Connection Sharing? If so, then you don't need it with the router. Perhaps if we first clear up this connection anomaly, or at least my understanding of it, we can get back to the problem at hand.
I received the following message today from Lexmark technical support, which appears to explain this problem:
"
The Z42 is not an inkjet model that is supported in a network environment.
Our inkjet printers that are supported on a network are limited to several
factors. In a peer to peer environment, supported printers require like
operating systems XP/XP or 98/98, thus no Windows 98/ME to XP/2000 shares
etc. The reason for this limitation is that the Z42 is a host based printer
that uses an operating system dependent datastream. This datastream will
be different for different versions of Windows."
For the record, the Dimension 8300 is connected via ethernet cable to the 1184 router and the router is connected to the ADSL modem also via ethernet cable. The Win98 computer is connected to the router via the 1180 USB wireless adapter.
volcano11
2 Intern
•
28K Posts
0
February 11th, 2004 01:00
No, you don't need to have any folders designated as shared folders on the remote PC in order for it to communicate with the printer. Since the host PC is running XP, have you checked to make sure that the XP firewall is disabled. The XP firewall will not block sharing of the Shared Documents folder, but it will block access to any other folder and will block access to the printer.
Steve
PurpleQuill
16 Posts
0
February 12th, 2004 01:00
Thanks for your comment, Steve.
Here's what I've done. On the host PC there are two listings under Network Connections. One is the Local Area Network (Intel (R) Pro/100 VE Network Connection), which I assume is the ethernet card in the computer. This has the Internet Connection Firewall disabled. The other is the broadband modem that is connected to the router. Here the ICF is enabled. I tried turning off ICF for the modem as well, but still no luck.
volcano11
2 Intern
•
28K Posts
0
February 12th, 2004 01:00
I don't understand why you have two network connections. Do you have two ethernet cards in the computer? Normally with a router, there should only be one connection. How is this all connected together? The router should be connected to the broadband modem through its WAN or Internet port. The computers should be connected either to one of the LAN ports on the router or through the wireless adapter, yet you say one of the computer is connected to the Dimension through the USB adapter. Are you running Internet Connection Sharing? If so, then you don't need it with the router. Perhaps if we first clear up this connection anomaly, or at least my understanding of it, we can get back to the problem at hand.
Steve
PurpleQuill
16 Posts
0
February 13th, 2004 00:00
I received the following message today from Lexmark technical support, which appears to explain this problem: