Since you have a router that assigns IP addresses, there is no need to have static IP addresses on your network.  I looked through helmig's page and didn't see anywhere where assigning static IP addresses is "recommended".  If you are using a hub or cross-over cable and not using internet connection sharing, then assigning static IP addresses is necessary, but on your network I don't see any advantage. 

Steve

Note that helmig's site is getting a bit old (although the Windows XP parts have been updated).  Still, when it comes to computers the old saying "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" generally applies.

Steve

Helmig does instruct you to assign static IP.  It's a little more than half way through the page.  But he doesn't say why.  I am having 2nd thoughts about changing something that works pretty well.

OK, I'm going to stick with dynamic.

The only device I'd be even slightly concerned about is the printer. But if the PCs aren't having any problems resolving the IP address of the printer given its name, DHCP and Windows name resolution are working as designed.

It ain't broke! :-)

Jim

On a home network llike yours, there's not much benefit of static IPs.  The only reason I've needed them is to use a third-party remote control program so I can run other pcs from one.  Static IPs let me set shortcuts to each machine that won't change.

Otherwise, as you said, don't muck with something that's not broke

Val

Val,  I haven't had any problems with the printer but I've only had it installed for a few days.  I believe that HP's installation disk wizard tells you to use dynamic.  But I'll be on the lookout for printer problems that might benefit from static.  Until then I'll stick with dynamic.  Thanks.