Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

189 Posts

8196

August 16th, 2008 00:00

Confusion about what internet security software is needed

I am getting cofused about how much internet security, antivirus software I should have on my computers. 

 

I have a new XPS 420 desktop with 4GB memory & 750GB hard drive and an Inspiron 6000 laptop with 1GB memory and 60GB hard drive.  They are currently networked via a Netgear WNDR3300 wireless router.  My HP  C6280 printer is attached to the  network.  The new XPS runs under Windows VISTA SP1 and the laptop, Windows XP PRO SP2.

 

I am trying to get my software installed on the new desktop.  For years I used Norton Antivirus software, and then more recently Norton Internet Security software.  But when I had the network setup, it Norton conflicted with the old Netgear rounter (WGT624V3), so at the recommendation of the technician fixing the system, I started using Trend Micro Internet Security.  That worked OK until I upgraded to Trend Micro Internet Security PRO 2008, and this took so many resources my computer would run (particularly my old Dell Dimension 8250).  Also, with the old Netgear router, I had to disable the internet security options as their was a conflict.  So I experimented on the laptop with a free version of AVAST and Ad-Aware SE Plus.  These two worked pretty well together and I had about decided to replace the Trend Micro software on the old desktop until I finally decided to purchase the new computer.

 

Now, I in a quandry again.  With the Netgear WNDR3300 router, I have their WPA-PSK security set up.  My VISTA from Dell came with Windows Defender.  Tonight I tried to install the  Trend Micro Internet Security PRO 2008 but was told by VISTA that Trend Micro was not compatible with my version of the operating system.   I asked the Netgear people if I still needed to install internet security software in addition to the AVAST anti-virus software considering their security options and was told I should.  Currently, I have only the AVAST Home Edition on the new desktop.

 

What would be some of your recommendations? Should I return to Norton?  Is Windows Defender and AVAST along with the Netgear security option enough? Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

 

 

 

2 Intern

 • 

5.8K Posts

 • 

17.3K Points

August 16th, 2008 02:00

I'm not sure what extra internet security NetGear was advising you needed. What you need for adequate protection is:

 

1) One (and only one) antivirus - I think avast! 4.8 Home Edition is a perfectly good AV.
2) One (and only one) software firewall. You already have Vista's built-in  software firewall
3) An actively running antispyware. You already have this in Windows Defender, and I personally see no need to purchase another. You should also get a couple of free on-demand antimalware scanners; more info on them here:
http://naut.homestead.com/files/Free/free2.html#On-Demand%20Anti-Malware%20Scanners


 

The router you use provides further hardware firewall protection against inbound threats to your network.

 

In short, I think you are already covered for basic protection, assuming all are up and configured properly (and speaking personally, I would avoid Norton products).

 

 --------------------------------------------

 

Free security software: A primer

 

 

5 Journeyman

 • 

15.6K Posts

 • 

45K Points

August 16th, 2008 11:00

just to emphasize, make sure you have the programs loaded on BOTH of your computers.

 

for example, you indicated having windows defender (pre-included) on your VISTA system.   you can download it for free, for your XP system:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=435bfce7-da2b-4a6a-afa4-f7f14e605a0d&DisplayLang=en

 

you also mentioned having ad-aware SE plus.    I know that support for AA SE (FREE) ended in Dec. '07; I'm not sure about the plus.   If you've paid for it, and if they're still continuing to offer you updated reference files, i guess it couldn't hurt to keep around.   but i wouldn't pay to renew it.   the anti-malware scanners suggested by Joe are, in my opinion, far preferable.

 

XP also has a firewall of its own.

1.5K Posts

August 16th, 2008 20:00

Hi folks. Here's my current setup.

 

 

SuperantiSpyware for my malware scanner

 

SpywareBlaster

 

Comodo Pro for my firewall

 

AntiVir for my antivirus

August 16th, 2008 21:00

My setup


Virus protection:Most trend micro products, avg, avast!

 

Spyware protection:Spybot search and destroy


Firewall:Default windows xp sp2 firewall


Backup virus protection:windows defender

 

5 Journeyman

 • 

15.6K Posts

 • 

45K Points

August 16th, 2008 22:00

Mr. Kevin,

 

1)  You wrote:  "Virus protection:Most trend micro products, avg, avast!"

 

You want to be running one, and only one, resident [real-time] anti-virus program.   rather than increasing ("doubling" ) your protection, running more than one can lead to conflicts and slowdowns --- it can, in fact, lower your virus protection!

So if you're running the above [under default installations], you need to choose only one, and uninstall the rest.

 

note:  I realize some people are "experimenting", by installing multiple anti-virus programs, but keeping only one running in real-time by disabling the resident module of the other(s).   if you know what you're doing, and want to perform such "testing", that's your prerogative.   but it's certainly not recommended in general.

 

2) windows defender is an anti-SPYWARE program, not an anti-VIRUS program.

 

Message Edited by ky331 on 08-16-2008 07:27 PM

2 Intern

 • 

887 Posts

August 17th, 2008 00:00

Not aware of norton "conflicting" with router network setups if properly setup and configured and running only one software firewall.   Norton products are Vista compatible.  Kaspersky is a good product as well.

August 17th, 2008 13:00

i know, i was listing what i recommended and used over the years, this computer has been working.

 

 

Oh, i didnt know windows defender was anti-spyware.

189 Posts

August 17th, 2008 13:00

Joe, I meant to include your comments in the solution as well, but did not realize the "Solved" option could only be used for one comment.  I appreciate you many suggestions and will use them.  Thanks much!

189 Posts

August 17th, 2008 13:00

Thank you all for your most informative comments.  It sounds as if I'm pretty well protected except for the malware.  I suppose I've gotten a bit paranoid about security since the computer got a bad Trojan bug while using Norton a couple of years ago, which is why it was recommended that I change to Trend Micro.  Each of your commentsd has helpved very much.

5 Journeyman

 • 

15.6K Posts

 • 

45K Points

August 17th, 2008 13:00

Sandy,

 

You should be able to change the "accepted solution", by removing it from my response, and adding it to Joe's.

 

I may be joe's biggest fan in these forums , and so, would not be at all insulted if you implement this change.

2 Intern

 • 

5.8K Posts

 • 

17.3K Points

August 17th, 2008 14:00

SandyC:

 

You are very welcome. I don't pay much attention to who gets the credit; it's more important to hear your concerns are resolved, and how, for the benefit of others. Thanks for the feedback.

189 Posts

August 17th, 2008 15:00

Well, I tried, but couldn't figure out how.  In any case, your comments were also most useful.  I tried to key both yours and his comments as solutions, but as you know, that did not work.  I'm glad that Joe is not offended because you both have provided useful answers since I have the laptop still running Windows XP PRO SP2.  I just found out yesterday that although my laptop recognizes the network and I can get to the internet, it doest not recogize the desktop which runs under VISTA, so I've additional work to do there.  Luckily, I can get to the laptop shared files from the desktop.  I'm glad to know about Defender working under XP.

0 events found

No Events found!

Top