Browse Community
Help
Log In
Responses(4)
Solutions(0)
itzikr
28 Posts
0
October 10th, 2014 01:00
In the VERY old days (esx3) , if you created VMFS partitions via cli, they were unaligned by default, its not an issue since 2009 ☺
sullybags
1 Rookie
•
45 Posts
Andreas
what they are referring to is VMFS partition alignment.
page 5
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx3_partition_align.pdf
to the best of my knowledge this is not a issue on EMC storage due to the block sizes we use.
its been a few years since i checked this, but the document above should be a good starting point.
October 10th, 2014 02:00
Well, VMware recommend to run a refresh of the pool whenever the linked clone reach around 13% of size of the parental image.
Apart from it, check your array, I assume you are using fast cache.
Ando2
9 Posts
Thanks, are you guys aware of any read performance issues on longer VMware linked clone chain lenghts?
Dell Support Resources
View All
Top
itzikr
28 Posts
0
October 10th, 2014 01:00
In the VERY old days (esx3) , if you created VMFS partitions via cli, they were unaligned by default, its not an issue since 2009 ☺
sullybags
1 Rookie
•
45 Posts
0
October 10th, 2014 01:00
Andreas
what they are referring to is VMFS partition alignment.
page 5
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx3_partition_align.pdf
to the best of my knowledge this is not a issue on EMC storage due to the block sizes we use.
its been a few years since i checked this, but the document above should be a good starting point.
itzikr
28 Posts
0
October 10th, 2014 02:00
Well, VMware recommend to run a refresh of the pool whenever the linked clone reach around 13% of size of the parental image.
Apart from it, check your array, I assume you are using fast cache.
Ando2
9 Posts
0
October 10th, 2014 02:00
Thanks, are you guys aware of any read performance issues on longer VMware linked clone chain lenghts?