I've come to this thread with the same problem outlined by Alaskan Jackel. I have a DELL Precision 4800 with two SSDs, both encrypted with bitlocker. The system drive can be suspended and the fixed data drive cannot. Bitlocker can only be turned off on the fixed data drive.
Unfortunately, the link in the answer provided by Jesse is to turn off the auto-unlock feature and does nothing to address the original problem posted by Alaskan Jackel.
My response is to ask why the DELL Command Update does not provide ANY feedback regarding bitlocker when the user SUSPENDS the system drive but leaves the fixed data drive encrypted. This is just poor UX on DELL's part and this issue is made even more inexcusable because this is a common issue for people with two-drive bitlocker encryption.
The other response I have is why the heck hasn't DELL mitigated the problem by making Command Update more intelligent? Seriously, are we still in the Windows XP era of seriously dumb application design? Why isn't Command Update satisfied when it sees that the system drive is suspended?
Can someone from DELL please address all of these points in a comprehensive reply here in this forum thread - PLEASE. I want to get on and just install this damned BIOS update and BE DONE!
DELL-Jesse L
Moderator
•
17.9K Posts
0
September 14th, 2016 07:00
alaskanjackal,
Click the link below to see if the information posted will help you with bitlocker on your second hard drive.
BitLocker and Windows 10
Nick Walt
3 Posts
0
April 12th, 2017 22:00
I've come to this thread with the same problem outlined by Alaskan Jackel. I have a DELL Precision 4800 with two SSDs, both encrypted with bitlocker. The system drive can be suspended and the fixed data drive cannot. Bitlocker can only be turned off on the fixed data drive.
Unfortunately, the link in the answer provided by Jesse is to turn off the auto-unlock feature and does nothing to address the original problem posted by Alaskan Jackel.
My response is to ask why the DELL Command Update does not provide ANY feedback regarding bitlocker when the user SUSPENDS the system drive but leaves the fixed data drive encrypted. This is just poor UX on DELL's part and this issue is made even more inexcusable because this is a common issue for people with two-drive bitlocker encryption.
The other response I have is why the heck hasn't DELL mitigated the problem by making Command Update more intelligent? Seriously, are we still in the Windows XP era of seriously dumb application design? Why isn't Command Update satisfied when it sees that the system drive is suspended?
Can someone from DELL please address all of these points in a comprehensive reply here in this forum thread - PLEASE. I want to get on and just install this damned BIOS update and BE DONE!
hiddeneyes02
1 Message
0
November 25th, 2017 14:00
Same problem here, please an answer.
KBolderman
8 Posts
2
April 19th, 2018 01:00
You need to suspend protection on the second hard drive using elevated powershell.
So let's assume the second drive is E: than use this command;
Suspend-Bitlocker -MountPoint "E:"
Then afterwards you need to activate the protection again, can be done via GUI in the same way as C:.
Cheers
holyshnikiesbatman
1 Message
0
November 1st, 2018 12:00
This worked for me, great solution. Thank you!!