34 Posts

August 16th, 2006 17:00

I have an x1300 in my new laptop, which is an ATI card and similar in performance to the Nvidia 7300 go. I can play newer games on medium settings or low setting and get acceptable game performance. Both of these Graphics cards are considered low end and its perfectly normal to get a low score in 3Dmark. Lowering in game graphic settings should usually make a game more playable. I've never played world of warcraft, so I can't comment on that sorry.

6 Posts

August 16th, 2006 22:00

There is a usually a performance setting that you can access by right clicking on your desktop. You should see an option for "NVIDIA Display" -> Laptop Display. You'll get what looks like NVidia Display Control Panel. There is a vertical tab for "Performance & Quality Settings" there. See if you can tweak any of those to make a difference.
 
This is also a good 3rd party site about NVIDIA chips for laptops:

4 Posts

August 17th, 2006 11:00

I have set everything on the card to max performance; however, the game still performs poorly. This game runs just fine on a 4 year old laptop with a 128meg graphics card, half the RAM, and a much poorer processor. I just need to know if the types of scores I'm getting with Aquamark and 3Dmark06 are accurate or odd. I am going to return the machine if it can't out perform my old laptop; however, I want to make sure it is a performance problem with ALL of the modle or if it is just a problem with the one I have.

34 Posts

August 17th, 2006 12:00

Sometimes getting the latest game patch from the publisher of the game sometimes helps. Nvidia 7300 go like I stated before is a low end GFX card and its not unusual to recieve a poor score from 3Dmark.

4 Posts

August 17th, 2006 12:00

But how low is low? Perhaps you can run it on your machine with the ATI card in it?

34 Posts

August 17th, 2006 12:00

Its the lowest GFX in the Geforce 7 series just like the 6200 was the lowest GFX in the 6 series. Its probably slightly better than the 6200, but I have no benchmarks to be certain. I'll run 3Dmark 06 and post back with the results of it running on an x1300.

4 Posts

August 17th, 2006 14:00

Ah, see, the Geforce got a rating of 300, something is very wrong.

34 Posts

August 17th, 2006 14:00

I'm Running 3Dmark 06 on an Inspiron 6400 my specs are:

Core Duo 1.6Ghz
1GB of Ram
x1300 hypermemory

My 3Dmark 06 score is: 629
sm2.0 score: 204
HDR/SM3.0 score: 237
CPU score:1284

34 Posts

August 17th, 2006 14:00

Worth searching Google because I found quite a few matches concerning the 7300 GO. I'm not really a technical expert on this, but from what I gather the x1300 is suppose to use a 128bit interface and the 7300 is from what I read uses a 64bit interface. Apparently this can effect the bandwidth.

11 Posts

July 26th, 2007 23:00

Hope no one minds if I get on my soap box for a minute.
 
If you are running Vista the best you can do with a 7300 is basically a 3.0. I'm sorry but for a 256meg card, that is beyond awful. The ATI X1400 is said to be a little better.
 
A big problem is - THOSE ARE THE ONLY TWO CARDS.  If you have a e1705 you can do better. If you went down to an e1505 so you'd have a battery they could last more then one movie you're out of luck. To say the least I am very disappointed with the choices Dell gave you for that PC.
 
If you are a daring person you could try to convert to the 64 bit version of windows but you could put yourself into a whole new world of hurt by doing that.
No Events found!

Top