4 Posts

November 6th, 2006 06:00

I'd have to concur. This has been a pretty poor printer in general, reflective of most of DELL's products these days. As of right now, my 962 won't even work due to a software error that's interfering with its capability to communicate with my computer. I've had issues with the scanner being jammed, the color cartridge not working, inability to recognize proper cartridges, and just extremely poor software.

I guess technically the 962 is a rebranded Lexmark, but that doesn't excuse DELL. I'd have to say one of the worst aspects, besides its reliability, is the fact that the toner cartridges are engineered to be low volume. Now I understand that manufacturers typically take a loss on the printers themselves and make up for them by selling the toner cartridges, but the rate at which this thing depletes ink is madness, and the software that intentionally gives you error warnings unless you buy a DELL specific ink cartridge is outrageous.

Until DELL decides to clean up its act, I will never again buy another one of their products, nor will I recommend their products to anybody (with the exception of their monitors maybe... as long as they don't pull another 2007FP debacle).

2 Intern

 • 

7.9K Posts

November 6th, 2006 16:00

ink jets (and especially ink jet catridges) don't have great track records anywhere. all of them seem to have head or ink problems -- especially if you don't use it much or leave the printer on but idle.

if you print any volume at all, lasers really are the way to go. they cost more up front but they'll save you a lot of time and frustration. this is even more true if you don't use color often.

November 7th, 2006 03:00

I definitely agree with your comments NemesisDB. Laser is definitely the way to go. The only shortcoming though is that it does not print in color when needed. I know that I used my 962 fairly regularly, printing at least every other day or so, so there was never times where it sat in disuse. However I used the scanning feature much more, for keeping statements electronically that weren't available online or receipts for rebate/warranty purposes. The fact the machine wouldn't last a year really speaks to the quality of this machine. While you are correct that inkjets have lots of areas that can fail (more so perhaps than Laser), I would highly doubt that other manufacturers (ie Canon, HP, Epson) have just as short of lifespans (although there are no doubt some examples). Based on the feedback on this printer though, this seems to be more of the norm rather than the exception. As DarkMastyr states, I too would NEVER recommend a Dell printer (or Lexmark for that matter) ever. The only good Dell thing I have so far is my Axim 3x which is very good, so just to show this isn't a blind rant against Dell, I do like some products. This one though is just horrible and their inability to support it speaks volumes against this company and would make me question buying even a different product from them. It leaves a bitter taste... The response I got from support to replace right away was nice, but of course who wants to keep on replacing faulty equipment with more faulty equipment. I am sure now that I am over a year since my original purchase (and actually much less with this refurbished model) that this will fall on deaf ears now, especially since they don't even make this model anymore, moving on to a "redesigned" version that appears to have similar issues. Best of luck to those who have them, and to those who are researching, you've been warned!

I have since added a review to epinions about this printer, and have just purchased the Canon PIXMA MP830. It appears to have a much better track record, its been on the market for about a year now, with WAY FEWER complaints (there are some, but farther in between). I'll of course rate it as well, and hope for the best. It can't be any worse.

2 Intern

 • 

7.9K Posts

November 7th, 2006 03:00

we've been using a dell 1600N (multifunction laser) at work fairly heavily. it has its problems (replaced under warranty once, and quickly at that) but by and large the thing works very well. ADF almost never jams, which is by far the best thing about it :)

doesn't do color, obviously. color lasers are getting cheaper though. if you really print color every day you can probably justify it -- unless you specifically need ink.

6 Posts

December 18th, 2006 22:00

Hi,
 
Can't believe that I have a pile of junk, too! I'm having the same problem with showing the right cartridge incorrect. Guess I will try a new cartridge and if that dosen't work, will junk it. I have had it for almost two years and this is the first time i have had this problem!

6 Posts

December 24th, 2006 19:00

The thing is a peice of junk and Dell gives no relief. We have had the same problem and it is now the third time in two years. The first time they sent a replacement cartridge and it worked a few more months, the second time we had to buy a cartridge abd again it lasted a few more months.  There are several more other posts on this subject so it is not an isolated problem.  I think Dell has a defective product in either the printer or the cartridges and will not admit to it. Or they have made them become obsolete based on age on purpose to increase profits. I am so glad that you have to use genuine Dell cartridges to get this "high" level of service and performance. Unfortunately the Indian service people are of no help. I have an HP combination printer, fax copier that is much older, gets the same use, does not eat cartridges (and cartridges are available anywhere) and never is a problem. This is my last Dell product. Good luck.
No Events found!

Top