2.6K Posts

September 21st, 2004 02:00

I have a couple friends that run at that. I would too, but couldn't afford the screen.

I have 20/900 vision (20/20 corrected :))

2 Intern

 • 

1.3K Posts

September 21st, 2004 03:00

I run at 1920 x 1200. I wouldn't trade it for anything. Except a higher resolution.... and supposedly, my vision is terrible.

43 Posts

September 21st, 2004 06:00

I do and i would do 2048x1536 if i could, i hope higher resolution lcd's will come out, im glad dell has high res LCD's my vision is pretty bad but i can only not see well far away, so on screens its fine even when i need to update my perscription, last time i think my perscription was -4.25 or something diopters im not sure what that is in 20/x, also on my 22 inch CRT i run at 2560x1920 which is smaller than 1920x1200 on the laptop, and i can read it fine.



@mattcowger wrote:
I have a couple friends that run at that. I would too, but couldn't afford the screen.

I have 20/900 vision (20/20 corrected :))


Inspiron 8600b
15.4" Samsung WSGXA+ (1680x1050)
Pentium-M 1.8GHz Dothan, 512 MB Memory, 40GB 5400RPM HD
Atheros 5212 (b/g) wireless (100mw/22dBm!), NEC DVD+RW
Windows XP Pro, Fedora Core 2
Dell APR, DualHead w/ 2x1703FP 17" LCDs
15GB 3rd Gen iPod, Sennheiser HD600



You couldn't afford the UXGA? yet you could pay the premium for the DVD+RW and the 1.8 GHz cpu?

27 Posts

September 21st, 2004 14:00

1920x1200 is just too small for comfort for me. I guess I'm used to my desktop's 1280x1024 LCD. An upside of the high res screen, even when running at lower res, the screen's physical pixel density is so high you can't see any of them.

I know there are some super high res (ballpark 11050x8500) 22" LCD screens out there but they are also very expensive ($8000) and you need a special video card to drive them.

130 Posts

September 21st, 2004 20:00

I run it happily and like the 'real estate'. Friends take one look and say it's too small because they are used to 1024X768. I look at their monitors & wonder how they get by with so little space on them. It's what you get used to I guess....

43 Posts

September 21st, 2004 20:00

11050x8500? highest i know of are 3800x2400 from viewsonic and IBM, and they go for about $6k

425 Posts

September 22nd, 2004 14:00

i will always trade up for a higher resolution.  1920x1200 is still to low of a res for me.

81 Posts

September 23rd, 2004 15:00

Of course, that is why i bought mine. Of course people look at me strange and ask me how i can read it.
No Events found!

Top