Nobody has an answer? I called up Dell and talked to three different people about this but each one seemed more confused than the previous as to what I was talking about.
I have taken some pictures of the differences:
http://ranma13.no-ip.com/monitor1.jpg In this picture, both monitors are set to brightness: 100, contrast: 50, color: 100/100/100. They look exactly the same when I switch the DVI/VGA connections.
http://ranma13.no-ip.com/monitor2.jpg Here is a picture of me running Photoshop with a pure white (RGB 255/255/255) canvas and a square that's filled with RGB 250/250/250. On the left monitor which is currently using the VGA connection, the square cannot be seen, but on the right monitor it is visible although tinted slightly green. Brightness and contrast for both monitors are at 100/50 and color setting for the left monitor is 50/50/50 and for the right one it's 100/95/95. When I switch the connection, the square shows up nice and bright on the left monitor using DVI and the right one looks exactly the same on both VGA and DVI.
This issue is driving me nuts, why in the world do two monitors that have the exact same model number (only difference is the s and t suffix) have such different performances with color???
you have two 1704, fpv monitors, one a fpvs, model, one a fpvt, model, they are two different displays, the fpvt, is made by liteon, and the fpvs, is made by samsung, thus the slight differences, you need to get two of the exact same, type & and manufacturer i guess, did you order these new or were they refubs? also, were they bought at the same time?
look at this link for the fp1703 monitors, at the middle of the page it shows the manufacturers. the second link is the1704 monitor regulatory page used to show both as well, but now it only shows one.
this is just a guess, but id say thats what is going on.
Message Edited by speedy5200 on 02-09-2005 08:47 PM
I see, thank you very much for that clarification. All my searches could turn up was that the 1704FPVs was listed as for the Optiplex SX280 whereas the 1704FPVt had no computer that it was designed for.
I bought the 1704FPVs as a new unit and asked for a replacement about 4 days after due to the dead pixels and slightly blurry text, and that's when I got the FPVt. Otherwise than that I was quite happy with it but the 1704FPVt was definitely not up to par, colors looked washed out and was too cool despite my best attempts at tweaking it both with software and with the monitor's OSD. The only thing the t model had over the s model was that text was slightly sharper.
If indeed the panel was made by Samsung, it definitely shows. The LiteOn panel is no match for the Samsung one. However, I've decided that this isn't worth my hassle so I decided to return both and wait until I have enough money to pick up a 1905FP, which I'm wishing that I won't run into the same trouble as I did here. All the reviews I read stated that it uses the same panel as the Samsung 193P and I hope that stays true when I buy it.
Having two monitors with exactly the same model number but a different panel manufacturer is simply ridiculous. I expected to get a replacement unit that looked exactly the same (since I was perfectly happy with it except for the dead pixels) and I get something that can't even beat the socks (color-wise) off my old LCD. The very least Dell could have done was slap on a different model number instead of just providing a different suffix. The average home user might not care about color saturation but there's a reason why I picked up an Ultrasharp instead of their lower LCD model. Color saturation is very important when you work with Photoshop on a daily basis.
here is the 1905fp, reg link, its made by liteon as well. i have the1704fpvt, and i really like mine, although ive never seen the samsung model to compare. i almost got a 1905fp, but they were on b?O when i boght mine. good luck!
You can tell the difference when you put the 2 panels side by side. The 1704FPVt is definitely more blue.
Your color settings are set to about 100/100/100, right? On a 1704FPVs, those settings will produce a nearly-white screen and the optimal settings are 50/50/50.
I guess it's really up to the user what they want. I do a lot of Photoshop work so I need accurate colors. The t model was tinted way too blue and made my images look like the wrong hue.
Ranma13
11 Posts
0
February 9th, 2005 10:00
I have taken some pictures of the differences:
http://ranma13.no-ip.com/monitor1.jpg
In this picture, both monitors are set to brightness: 100, contrast: 50, color: 100/100/100. They look exactly the same when I switch the DVI/VGA connections.
http://ranma13.no-ip.com/monitor2.jpg
Here is a picture of me running Photoshop with a pure white (RGB 255/255/255) canvas and a square that's filled with RGB 250/250/250. On the left monitor which is currently using the VGA connection, the square cannot be seen, but on the right monitor it is visible although tinted slightly green. Brightness and contrast for both monitors are at 100/50 and color setting for the left monitor is 50/50/50 and for the right one it's 100/95/95. When I switch the connection, the square shows up nice and bright on the left monitor using DVI and the right one looks exactly the same on both VGA and DVI.
http://ranma13.no-ip.com/test.jpg
Here is the image I used to test the contrast on both monitors.
This issue is driving me nuts, why in the world do two monitors that have the exact same model number (only difference is the s and t suffix) have such different performances with color???
Message Edited by Ranma13 on 02-09-2005 06:56 AM
Message Edited by Ranma13 on 02-09-2005 06:58 AM
Message Edited by Ranma13 on 02-09-2005 06:59 AM
speedy5200
44 Posts
0
February 10th, 2005 00:00
Message Edited by speedy5200 on 02-09-2005 08:47 PM
Ranma13
11 Posts
0
February 10th, 2005 05:00
I bought the 1704FPVs as a new unit and asked for a replacement about 4 days after due to the dead pixels and slightly blurry text, and that's when I got the FPVt. Otherwise than that I was quite happy with it but the 1704FPVt was definitely not up to par, colors looked washed out and was too cool despite my best attempts at tweaking it both with software and with the monitor's OSD. The only thing the t model had over the s model was that text was slightly sharper.
If indeed the panel was made by Samsung, it definitely shows. The LiteOn panel is no match for the Samsung one. However, I've decided that this isn't worth my hassle so I decided to return both and wait until I have enough money to pick up a 1905FP, which I'm wishing that I won't run into the same trouble as I did here. All the reviews I read stated that it uses the same panel as the Samsung 193P and I hope that stays true when I buy it.
Having two monitors with exactly the same model number but a different panel manufacturer is simply ridiculous. I expected to get a replacement unit that looked exactly the same (since I was perfectly happy with it except for the dead pixels) and I get something that can't even beat the socks (color-wise) off my old LCD. The very least Dell could have done was slap on a different model number instead of just providing a different suffix. The average home user might not care about color saturation but there's a reason why I picked up an Ultrasharp instead of their lower LCD model. Color saturation is very important when you work with Photoshop on a daily basis.
speedy5200
44 Posts
0
February 11th, 2005 23:00
Ranma13
11 Posts
0
February 12th, 2005 02:00
Your color settings are set to about 100/100/100, right? On a 1704FPVs, those settings will produce a nearly-white screen and the optimal settings are 50/50/50.
I guess it's really up to the user what they want. I do a lot of Photoshop work so I need accurate colors. The t model was tinted way too blue and made my images look like the wrong hue.