Start a Conversation

Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

4887

November 24th, 2011 08:00

network design for iscsi on EMC-CX4

Hi,

I'm starting to work with an EMC-CX4 240 and I would like to configure the iSCSI feature with High Availability but I have some doubts about the network design and ports configuration.

I have a couple of switches to use as core network, my servers have one NIC connected to switch_01 and another NIC to switch_02 using ip addresses from the networks in that switches...

I've configured two vlans:

Switch_01

- 192.168.110.0/27 (iSCSI_VLAN1)

Switch_02

- 192.168.120.0/27 (iSCSI_VLAN2)

The EMC has two 1Gb ports per SP... I can see that one per SP has a tag (MirrorView) and I'm not sure the behavior of these ports... I have configured an connect each SP as following:

Switch_01

Slot A1 Port 0 / SP-Port A-2 -> 192.168.110.1/27

Slot A1 Port 1 / SP-Port A-3 (MirrorView) -> ¿?

Switch_02

Slot B1 Port 0 / SP-Port B-2 -> 192.168.120.1/27

Slot B1 Port 1 / SP-Port B-3 (MirrorView) -> ¿?

Is this design ok?... should I configure the MirrorView Ports?... Should I change something?

Thanks in advanced.

7 Posts

November 24th, 2011 10:00

I'm not planning to connect the CX to another system to replication. What I'm trying to configure is a redundant iscsi connectivity as i have done with the Fibers (two ports per SP, crossed connections to a couple of switches)... but I don't know if I have to use the same Network for all ports, and if the ports tagged as MirrorView have different characteristics than the other ports. Should I cross the connectivity in the same way I did with the SAN network?

2 Intern

 • 

20.4K Posts

November 24th, 2011 10:00

You can use MirrorView ports for host connectivity, any plans of using MirrorView for replication to another CX/VNX ?

2 Intern

 • 

20.4K Posts

November 24th, 2011 11:00

nothing special for MirrorView ports, other than you can't use those ports with SanCopy. Yes you want to have have SPA and SPB on each subnet, just like you do with FC connections. I remember there was a good document with example of topologies ..take a look in this document.

TechBook: iSCSI SAN Topologies

4.5K Posts

November 25th, 2011 13:00

Also see the Support Solution emc245445 on PowerLink for more suggestions/recommendations for best practice when using iSCSI.

glen

5 Practitioner

 • 

274.2K Posts

November 25th, 2011 19:00

Switch_01

Switch_01

- 192.168.110.0/27 (iSCSI_VLAN1)

Switch_02

- 192.168.120.0/27 (iSCSI_VLAN2)

Slot A1 Port 0 / SP-Port A-2 -> 192.168.110.1/27

Slot A1 Port 1 / SP-Port A-3 (MirrorView) -> ¿?

Switch_02

Slot B1 Port 0 / SP-Port B-2 -> 192.168.120.1/27

Slot B1 Port 1 / SP-Port B-3 (MirrorView) -> ¿?

Above design is not good. You want to configure ports A1-0 and B1-0 in iSCSI-VLAN1 and ports A1-1 & B1-1 in iSCSI-VLAN2 as shown below

Switch_01

Slot A1 Port 0 / SP-Port A-2 -> 192.168.110.1/27

Slot A1 Port 1 / SP-Port A-3 (MirrorView) -> 192.168.120.1/27

Switch_02

Slot B1 Port 0 / SP-Port B-2 -> 192.168.110.2/27

Slot B1 Port 1 / SP-Port B-3 (MirrorView) -> 192.168.120.2/27

On host 1 initiator in iSCSI_VLAN1 (192.168.110.3/27 and other initiator in iSCSI_VLAN2 192.168.120.3/27

Have a separate subnet (VLAN) for management IPs.

2 Intern

 • 

20.4K Posts

November 26th, 2011 06:00

Switch_02 should be on a different subnet, 192.168.120.x (just like in original design).

5 Practitioner

 • 

274.2K Posts

November 27th, 2011 18:00

Dynamox is right. Two switches in 2 different subnets:

Switch_01

Slot A1 Port 0 / SP-Port A-2 -> 192.168.110.1/27

Slot B1 Port 0 / SP-Port B-2 -> 192.168.110.2/27

host initiator-1 in iSCSI_VLAN1 (192.168.110.3/27

Switch_02

Slot A1 Port 1 / SP-Port A-3 (MirrorView) -> 192.168.120.1/27

Slot B1 Port 1 / SP-Port B-3 (MirrorView) -> 192.168.120.2/27

host   initiator-2 in iSCSI_VLAN2 192.168.120.3/27

2 Intern

 • 

1.3K Posts

December 11th, 2011 16:00

is this implementation for WIndows , Linux or ESX? if Linux, have u done any recmmendations for "TCP Delayed ACK"

5 Practitioner

 • 

274.2K Posts

December 12th, 2011 10:00

SKT,  The answer in  reply #7 is for ESX, but it can be applied to a stand alone host as well. Delayed ACK should be disabled for all iSCSI targets on a host regardless of whether it is ESX or standalone. This should always be done if 10Gig iSCSI is in use.

4.5K Posts

December 13th, 2011 13:00

  • emc191777  (“Why is the performance slow on the ESX server when connected to a CLARiiON iSCSI array?”)
  • emc264171 ("Why is the Read performance for a Linux host slow when using iSCSI connecting to a CLARiiON array?")
  • emc150702 ("Recommended TCP/IP settings for Microsoft iSCSI configurations to fix slow performance")

glen

No Events found!

Top