The old drive was from an older PC. I installed a "virgin" copy of Windows 2000 pro, re-formating the drive in the process. I also downloaded and installed the latest MS updates. It now has the same Windows 2000, service pack 4, with the latest MS updates, as what I had on my troubled 320 GB drive. The only problem is that I didn't have the driver for my Gainward (nVidea) GF2 T1 graphics card, and I could not get the driver I downloaded from nVidea to work. But you are right, I need to concentrate on getting the OS on the 320 GB drive working, and not trying to "re-invent" it. The problem is I cannot get the 320 to boot, even in safe mode, and I cannot read the drive when I boot from the old one. I guess the next thing to try is to remove the 320 drive and try it in another PC, just to make sure it is OK. I was wondering if anyone else had the same problem when they had been using a drive successfully for a while, and then after a crash the OS was reporting a wrong, much smaller, capacity. It shows 128 GB instead of 320 GB in my case. Its as if large drive support just stopped working, although the BIOS does display the right size.
Well, I finally tried the "bad" drive in another PC. The generic PC had an ASUS motherboard with an AMD Athlon 1800, also running Win2K pro. I mounted the "bad" drive as a 2nd, slave drive. This PC had no problem recognizing that the "bad" drive was 300 GB, and had no problem reading the drive. So I do not understand why this drive works in one Win2K machine but not another. If the MBR was corrupt, wouldn't it cause problems in any PC that it was installed in? Or is this only a problem if the drive is the boot? Maybe the BIOS is somehow to blame.
mombodog
2 Intern
•
12.7K Posts
0
August 27th, 2007 21:00
Jeff_1
4 Posts
0
August 28th, 2007 00:00
mombodog
2 Intern
•
12.7K Posts
0
August 28th, 2007 14:00
mombodog
2 Intern
•
12.7K Posts
0
September 7th, 2007 18:00
Jeff_1
4 Posts
0
September 7th, 2007 18:00