2 Intern

 • 

172 Posts

February 24th, 2015 08:00

Yup. Would it do any good to delete the schedule and collection, and then recreate?

2 Intern

 • 

172 Posts

February 24th, 2015 08:00

Yup. Would it do any good to delete the collection and schedule, and then recreate?

2 Intern

 • 

172 Posts

February 24th, 2015 09:00

I'm at 7.0.9. I'll whack the collection schedules and create individual to see if that helps.

Thanks.

2 Intern

 • 

172 Posts

February 24th, 2015 10:00

Yes, it's the built in EQ snapshot scheduler. These are MS terminal server data volumes. I'm backing up nightly to a deduplication device, so the snapshots are mainly for quick recovery in case a server crashes. It was also originally for faster restore than tape for retrieving individual backup files because we didn't have dedup when I created the schedules. Since I can retrieve backup files from dedup a lot faster now, I'll probably change the schedule to only keep a few snapshots.

2 Intern

 • 

172 Posts

February 24th, 2015 11:00

Ah, OK, I'll check it out. Thanks for the tip.

Tim

2 Intern

 • 

172 Posts

February 24th, 2015 11:00

We're in the process of getting a 6210xs, so I'll be joining it to the 6000. I imagine the 6210 uses the same HIT/ME software, eh? Or is there something different for the hybrid arrays?

2 Intern

 • 

172 Posts

February 24th, 2015 13:00

2TB drives on the 6000. We still have a couple of years warranty on it, so we'll join the 6210 to it.

4 Operator

 • 

2.4K Posts

February 24th, 2015 13:00

Dont place your 6210xs together with a 6000e into the same pool. The capacity based LB would place most of the data on the 6000e.

Regards,

Joerg

2 Intern

 • 

172 Posts

February 24th, 2015 13:00

Thanks, Joerg. We'll put in separate pools.

2 Intern

 • 

172 Posts

February 24th, 2015 13:00

OK, thanks. We have raid6 on the 6000, too. I'll put the 2 units in separate pools and follow your other recommendations.

No Events found!

Top