Skip to main content

Dell PowerEdge C6615 Performance

David Dam
Dell PowerEdge C6615 Performance

Dell PowerEdge C6615 Performance

 

Authors:
David Dam – Principal Engineering Technologist
Kavya Ar – Sr. Systems Development Engineer

Summary

As power and cooling costs continue to occupy a substantial portion of IT budgets, IT departments are placing a strong emphasis on power efficiency to minimize the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) when selecting server hardware. This paper assesses the power efficiency of the new Dell PowerEdge C6615 server, a model designed in the multi-node, 2U form factor. Due to its adept balance between density and expandability, this form factor is widely used across various edge and telecom use cases.

Test configuration

Server

Processor

CPU Cores

Default TDP

Memory

OS

PowerEdge C6615

AMD EPYC 8324P

32

180W

6 x 64 GB 4800 MT/s

Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS

AMD EPYC 8534P

64

200W

6 x 64 GB 4800 MT/s

Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS

PowerEdge 1S Server

AMD EPYC 9334

32

240W

12 x 64 GB 4800 MT/s

Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS

AMD EPYC 9534

64

280W

12 x 64 GB 4800 MT/s

Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS

AMD STREAM

STREAM benchmark is used to calculate the memory bandwidth of a system. The Dell PowerEdge C6615, featuring the AMD EPYC 8534P 64-Core processor, shows a remarkable up to 142% enhancement in performance per watt per dollar. It also boasts an impressive up to 73% increase in performance per CPU dollar when compared to the Dell PowerEdge 1S server equipped with the AMD EPYC 9534P 64-Core processor[1] (Figure 1).

  1. STREAM results for selected AMD EPYC 64-Core processors

When compared to the Dell PowerEdge 1S server featuring the AMD EPYC 9334 32-Core processor, the test results showed up to a 114% improvement in performance per watt per dollar and up to 61% improvement in performance per CPU dollar[2] (Figure 2).

  1. STREAM results for selected AMD EPYC 32-Core processors

High-Performance Linpack (HPL)

High-Performance Linpack (HPL) is a benchmark used to measure the floating-point computing performance of a computer system. It is specifically designed to assess a system’s ability to solve a dense system of linear equations. HPL is widely used in the high-performance computing (HPC) industry and is considered a standard benchmark for evaluating supercomputers and clusters.

The results have shown outstanding cost-efficiency, revealing a remarkable up to 335% enhancement in performance per watt per dollar, and a substantial 210% increase in performance per CPU dollar when compared to PowerEdge 1S server equipped with the AMD EPYC 9534P 64-Core processor[3] (Figure 3).

  1. HPL results for selected AMD EPYC 64-Core processors

When compared to a PowerEdge 1S server equipped with the AMD EPYC 9334 32-Core processor, the results highlight exceptional cost-efficiency. It also features an impressive up to 209% improvement in performance per watt per dollar and a substantial 132% increase in performance per CPU dollar[4] (Figure 4).

  1. HPL results for selected AMD EPYC 32-Core processors

SPEC CPU 2017

The SPEC CPU® 2017 benchmark from the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC®) provides a comparative measure of compute-intensive performance using workloads developed from real user applications. SPEC CPU 2017 is the industry-standardized CPU intensive suite of benchmarks for measuring and comparing compute intensive performance, stressing a system's processor, memory subsystem and compiler. This benchmark is used by hardware vendors, IT industry, computer manufacturers, and government.

The results demonstrate remarkable cost-efficiency, with an impressive up to 281% improvement in performance per watt per dollar, and a substantial 172% increase in performance per CPU dollar when compared to a PowerEdge 1S server equipped with the AMD EPYC 9534P 64-Core processor[5] (Figure 5).

  1. SPECINTRate results for selected AMD EPYC 64-Core processors

When compared to the Dell PowerEdge 1S server which is equipped with the AMD EPYC 9334 32-Core processor, the test results indicate a significant improvement in cost-efficiency with a remarkable up to 205% increase in performance per watt per dollar, and an impressive up to 128% boost in performance per CPU dollar[6] (Figure 6).

  1. SPECINTRate results for selected AMD EPYC 32-Core processors

Conclusion

Through various benchmarks and workloads, it is evident that the dense compute-optimized design of Dell PowerEdge C6615, featuring lower cost, lower power AMD EPYC 8004 Series Server Processor, outperforms a similar 1S server equipped with the AMD EPYC 9004 Series Server Processor resulting in higher performance per watt per dollar and enhanced performance per dollar.

References

[1] Based on Dell internal calculations using AMD Stream benchmark achieved on a Dell PowerEdge C6615 and a TDP of 200W with AMD EPYC 8534P 64-Core processors compared to a Dell PowerEdge 1S server and a TDP 280W with AMD EPYC 9534P 64-Core processors.  Actual performance will vary.

[2] Based on Dell internal calculations using AMD Stream benchmark achieved on a Dell PowerEdge C6615 and a TDP of 180W with AMD EPYC 8324P 32-Core processors compared to a Dell PowerEdge 1S server and a TDP 240W with AMD EPYC 9334 32-Core processors.  Actual performance will vary.

[3] Based on Dell internal calculations using HPL benchmark achieved on a Dell PowerEdge C6615 and a TDP of 200W with AMD EPYC 8534P 64-Core processors compared to a Dell PowerEdge 1S server and a TDP 280W with AMD EPYC 9534P 64-Core processors.  Actual performance will vary.

[4] Based on Dell internal calculations using HPL benchmark achieved on a Dell PowerEdge C6615 and a TDP of 180W with AMD EPYC 8324P 32-Core processors compared to a Dell PowerEdge 1S server and a TDP 240W with AMD EPYC 9334 32-Core processors.  Actual performance will vary.

[5] Based on Dell analysis of submitted SPEC_CPU2017 score of 477 achieved on a Dell PowerEdge C6615 and a TDP of 200W with AMD EPYC 8534P 64-Core processors compared to a score of 606 on Dell PowerEdge 1S server and a TDP 280W with AMD EPYC 9534P 64-Core processors.  Actual performance will vary.

[6] Based on Dell analysis of submitted SPEC_CPU2017 score of 277 achieved on a Dell PowerEdge C6615 and a TDP of 180W with AMD EPYC 8324P 32-Core processors compared to a score of 356 on Dell PowerEdge 1S server and a TDP 240W with AMD EPYC 9334 32-Core processors.  Actual performance will vary.

Tags: